Get Da 2166 9 1 Form in PDF

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it's essential to follow certain guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance. Here’s a helpful list of dos and don'ts to keep in mind:

• Do double-check all personal information for accuracy, including names and SSNs.
• Do ensure that the dates entered are in the correct format (YYYYMMDD).
• Do review the completed form for any missing information before submission.
• Do keep a copy of the submitted form for your records.

• Don't leave any sections blank; if something does not apply, indicate that clearly.
• Don't use abbreviations or acronyms that may not be widely understood.
• Don't forget to sign and date the form where required.
• Don't submit the form without verifying that all required enclosures are included.

When filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form, which serves as the Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation Report for Sergeants, several key points should be kept in mind to ensure accuracy and compliance.

• Accurate Administrative Data: Ensure that all personal information, such as name, Social Security Number (SSN), rank, and unit details, is entered correctly in Part I. This information is crucial for proper identification and record-keeping.
• Understanding the Rater's Role: The rater is responsible for evaluating the NCO's performance. It is essential that the rater provides honest and constructive feedback in the evaluation sections. This feedback helps in the professional development of the NCO.
• Importance of Counseling Dates: Documenting counseling dates is vital. These dates indicate when the rated NCO received feedback on their performance, which is an important part of the evaluation process.
• Performance Evaluation Criteria: The evaluation sections assess various attributes, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each area requires thoughtful comments that reflect the NCO's performance against Army standards.
• Senior Rater's Assessment: The senior rater evaluates the NCO's potential compared to peers. Selecting the appropriate box to represent the rated NCO’s potential is significant, as it influences future assignments and career progression.

1. What is the DA Form 2166-9-1?

   The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an NCO Evaluation Report specifically designed for the evaluation of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant (SGT). It is used to assess their performance, professionalism, and potential for future assignments.

2. Who is required to complete this form?

   This form must be completed by the rater, senior rater, and the rated NCO. The rater is typically the immediate supervisor of the NCO, while the senior rater is usually one level above the rater. The rated NCO also has a role in acknowledging the report.

3. What information is included in Part I of the form?

   Part I of the DA Form 2166-9-1 includes administrative data such as the rated NCO's name, Social Security Number (or DOD ID), rank, unit information, and the reason for submission. This section ensures that all necessary identifying information is captured accurately.

4. What does Part II focus on?

   Part II focuses on authentication. It requires signatures from the rater and senior rater, along with their names, ranks, and email addresses. This section confirms that the evaluations have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate authorities.

5. What is included in the Duty Description section?

   In Part III, the rater provides a detailed description of the rated NCO's principal duties, including their daily responsibilities, areas of special emphasis, and any appointed duties. This section outlines the specific roles and expectations of the NCO.

6. How is performance evaluated in Part IV?

   Part IV evaluates several key attributes, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each attribute is assessed with comments indicating whether the NCO met the standard. The rater provides detailed feedback based on observed performance.

7. What is the purpose of the Senior Rater Overall Potential section?

   In Part V, the senior rater assesses the rated NCO's potential compared to peers. This section includes a selection of one of four potential ratings: Most Qualified, Highly Qualified, Qualified, or Not Qualified. It also requires listing two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.

8. What is the importance of the counseling dates?

   Counseling dates are crucial as they indicate when the rated NCO received feedback on their performance. This helps ensure that NCOs are aware of their standing and any areas needing improvement throughout the evaluation period.

9. Can the rated NCO disagree with the evaluation?

   While the rated NCO's signature on the form indicates that they have seen the report, it does not imply agreement with the evaluations. The rated NCO is informed about the appeals process if they believe their evaluation is inaccurate.

10. Where can I find guidance on how to complete this form?

    Guidance for completing the DA Form 2166-9-1 can be found in Army Regulation (AR) 623-3 and DA Pamphlet 623-3. These documents provide detailed instructions on the evaluation process and the responsibilities of each party involved.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Similar to the DA Form 67-9, which is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER), both forms serve to assess the performance and potential of military personnel. While the DA Form 2166-9-1 focuses specifically on NCOs, the DA Form 67-9 applies to officers. Each form includes sections for personal information, performance evaluations, and comments from raters and senior raters, ensuring a structured approach to performance assessment across different ranks.

Another document akin to the DA Form 2166-9-1 is the DA Form 4856, known as the Developmental Counseling Form. This form is utilized for documenting counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers, focusing on professional development and performance issues. Unlike the DA Form 2166-9-1, which summarizes an entire evaluation period, the DA Form 4856 allows for ongoing feedback and can be used to address specific concerns or commendations as they arise throughout a soldier's career.

Understanding the importance of documentation in professional settings, it is vital to ensure that all legal requirements are met, similar to how a Last Will and Testament is essential in managing personal affairs posthumously. In Illinois, to formalize these needs, individuals can utilize resources such as Illinois Forms to create a clear and effective will that outlines their wishes and protects their interests.

The DA Form 1059, or the Service School Academic Evaluation Report, is also similar in that it evaluates a soldier’s performance, but it does so in the context of academic achievement during military schooling. While the DA Form 2166-9-1 assesses overall performance in duty assignments, the DA Form 1059 specifically focuses on the soldier's academic performance and competencies acquired during training, making it essential for career progression and professional development within the military.

Another comparable document is the DA Form 2823, which is the Sworn Statement form. This form is used to gather firsthand accounts of incidents or observations that may impact evaluations or disciplinary actions. Although it does not directly evaluate performance, it provides critical context that can influence the assessments made in the DA Form 2166-9-1, ensuring that evaluations are fair and based on comprehensive information.

The DA Form 330, or the Language Proficiency Questionnaire, also shares similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1 in that it assesses a soldier's skills, specifically in language proficiency. While the latter focuses on a broader range of competencies and performance metrics, the DA Form 330 evaluates a soldier’s ability to communicate in foreign languages, which can be a vital asset in various military roles and missions.

Additionally, the DA Form 703, known as the Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard, is important for evaluating a soldier's physical readiness, which is a component of overall performance. The DA Form 2166-9-1 incorporates physical fitness as part of its evaluation criteria, but the DA Form 703 provides a detailed account of a soldier's physical fitness test results, allowing for a more focused assessment of physical capabilities.

Lastly, the DA Form 751, or the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) Referral Form, can also be considered similar in its evaluative nature. This form is used to document referrals for substance abuse evaluations and treatment. While it addresses a specific issue, its outcomes can significantly impact a soldier's overall performance evaluation on the DA Form 2166-9-1, especially if substance abuse affects duty performance or readiness.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a crucial document in the Army evaluation process, specifically for Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). Alongside this form, several other documents and forms are commonly utilized to ensure a comprehensive evaluation and administrative process. Below is a list of these documents, each serving a distinct purpose in the evaluation framework.

• DA Form 2166-9: This is the NCO Evaluation Report for higher ranks, providing a broader assessment of performance and potential. It is essential for documenting the career progression of NCOs.
• DA Form 4856: Known as the Developmental Counseling Form, it is used to record counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. This form helps in tracking performance and setting goals for improvement.
• DA Form 705: This form records the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It is vital for evaluating an NCO's physical readiness and adherence to Army standards.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These forms are used for recording body fat measurements for soldiers who exceed weight standards. They ensure compliance with Army weight control policies.
• DA Form 6125: This is the Army's version of the performance evaluation for enlisted personnel. It provides a structured method for assessing soldier performance and potential.
• DA Form 1059: This form documents academic evaluations for soldiers who complete military training courses. It is important for career development and promotion considerations.
• Minnesota Motorcycle Bill of Sale: This essential document ensures the legal transfer of motorcycle ownership, and for more details, visit motorcyclebillofsale.com/free-minnesota-motorcycle-bill-of-sale.
• AR 623-3: This Army regulation outlines the policies and procedures for the Army evaluation system. It serves as a guiding document for the proper completion and submission of evaluation reports.

Each of these documents plays a significant role in the overall evaluation process within the Army. Together, they help ensure that NCOs receive fair assessments that reflect their performance, potential, and adherence to Army standards. Proper use of these forms contributes to the professional development and career advancement of soldiers.

• Misconception 1: The DA 2166-9-1 form is only relevant for promotion evaluations.

This form serves multiple purposes, including performance evaluations and assessments of potential for future roles. It is not limited to promotion considerations alone.

• Misconception 2: Only the rater completes the form.

While the rater plays a significant role, the rated NCO also has responsibilities, such as verifying the accuracy of administrative data and understanding the evaluation process.

• Misconception 3: The signature of the rated NCO indicates agreement with the evaluation.

The rated NCO's signature confirms that they have seen the report and that the administrative data is correct, not that they agree with the content of the evaluation.

• Misconception 4: All evaluations are the same across different units.

Evaluations can vary based on the specific duties and responsibilities of the NCO, as well as the standards set by different units or commands.

• Misconception 5: The form does not require any supporting documentation.

While the form itself captures key performance metrics, it may require additional enclosures or documentation to provide context for the evaluations made.

• Misconception 6: The DA 2166-9-1 form is only for senior NCOs.

This form is specifically designed for evaluating Sergeants (SGT) and is applicable to all NCOs within that rank, not just senior leaders.

• Misconception 7: Performance evaluations are solely based on the rater's opinion.

While the rater's perspective is crucial, evaluations also consider objective performance metrics, including adherence to Army values and standards.

• Misconception 8: The appeals process is not an option for rated NCOs.

Rated NCOs have the right to appeal their evaluations if they believe there are inaccuracies or unfair assessments, as outlined in the appeals process of AR 623-3.